Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola juice
Acerola juice2
VS
Sweet cherries, canned in juice Leader
Sweet cherries, canned in juice6

Sweet cherries, canned in juice leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Sweet cherries, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola juice for less sugar and more vitamin C.

Pick Sweet cherries, canned in juice for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on sodium and magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    23 kcal
    54 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.4 g
    0.91 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.8 g
    13.81 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.3 g
    1.5 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN4.5 g
    12.31 g
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    3 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    97 mg
    131 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.58 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    12 mg
    12 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1600 mg
    2.5 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola juice vs Sweet cherries, canned in juice · Foodatron