Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apricots, canned in juice Leader
Apricots, canned in juice8
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2

Apricots, canned in juice leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Apricots, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apricots, canned in juice for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    48 kcal
    67 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.63 g
    0.18 g
  • Carbohydrate
    12.34 g
    16.84 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.6 g
    2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN10.74 g
    14.84 g
  • Total fat
    0.04 g
    0.43 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0 g
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN165 mg
    70 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN12 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.3 mg
    0.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN10 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN4.9 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apricots, canned in juice vs Apples, canned · Foodatron