Angel Hair vs Chickpea Rotini

Chickpea Rotini leads 4–2 · 6 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpea Rotini comes out ahead, winning 4 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Angel Hair for less sugar and less saturated fat.

Pick Chickpea Rotini for more protein, more fiber, more calcium and more iron.

Evenly matched on sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
357.14 kcal
339.29 kcal
Proteinmore is better
12.5 g
21.43 gWIN
Carbohydrate
75 g
60.71 g
Fibermore is better
5.36 g
7.14 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
WIN1.79 g
3.57 g
Total fat
1.79 g
6.25 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0 g
0.89 g
Sodiumless is better
0 mg
0 mg
Potassiummore is better
—
—
Calciummore is better
21.43 mg
51.79 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
3.57 mg
5.36 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
—
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
—
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.