Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Brick cheese
Brick cheese2
VS
Swiss cheese Leader
Swiss cheese6

Swiss cheese leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Swiss cheese comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Brick cheese for more potassium and more iron.

Pick Swiss cheese for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    393 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23.24 g
    26.96 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    2.79 g
    1.44 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.51 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    29.68 g
    30.99 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    18.76 g
    18.23 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    560 mg
    187 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN136 mg
    72 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    674 mg
    890 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.43 mg
    0.13 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    24 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Brick cheese vs Swiss cheese · Foodatron