Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned Leader
Apples, canned6
VS
Cranberry sauce, canned
Cranberry sauce, canned4

Apples, canned leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Apples, canned comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Cranberry sauce, canned for more protein, less saturated fat, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    159 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.9 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    40.4 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    1.1 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN14.84 g
    31.75 g
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.15 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.01 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3 mg
    5 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN70 mg
    28 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN4 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.41 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN3 mg
    2 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Cranberry sauce, canned · Foodatron