Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned4
VS
Maraschino cherries Leader
Maraschino cherries6

Maraschino cherries leads 6–4 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Maraschino cherries comes out ahead, winning 6 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Pick Maraschino cherries for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    165 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.22 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    41.97 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2 g
    3.2 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN14.84 g
    38.77 g
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.21 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.04 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3 mg
    4 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN70 mg
    21 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    54 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.43 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.2 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Maraschino cherries · Foodatron