Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, canned
Apples, canned1
VS
Sweet cherries, canned in juice Leader
Sweet cherries, canned in juice8

Sweet cherries, canned in juice leads 8–1 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Apples, canned: 100 g · Sweet cherries, canned in juice: 100 g.

The verdict

Sweet cherries, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 8 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, canned for more fiber.

Pick Sweet cherries, canned in juice for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    67 kcal
    54 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.18 g
    0.91 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    16.84 g
    13.81 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2 g
    1.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    14.84 g
    12.31 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.43 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    3 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    70 mg
    131 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.24 mg
    0.58 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    12 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.2 mg
    2.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, canned vs Sweet cherries, canned in juice · Foodatron