Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick, cooked Leader
Chicken drumstick, cooked4
VS
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted1

Chicken drumstick, cooked leads 4–1 · 5 categories decided · 5 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken drumstick, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium, magnesium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    155 kcal
    191 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN24.24 g
    23.35 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    5.7 g
    10.15 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.51 g
    2.74 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    128 mg
    123 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN256 mg
    247 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    11 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.14 mg
    1.11 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    22 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick, cooked vs Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted · Foodatron