Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick, raw
Chicken drumstick, raw2
VS
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted5

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick, raw for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    116 kcal
    191 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.41 g
    23.35 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.71 g
    10.15 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.95 g
    2.74 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN114 mg
    123 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    225 mg
    247 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    9 mg
    11 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.76 mg
    1.11 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    20 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick, raw vs Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted · Foodatron