Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted Leader
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted6
VS
Chicken fat (schmaltz)
Chicken fat (schmaltz)1

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken fat (schmaltz) for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    191 kcal
    900 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.35 g
    0 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    10.15 g
    99.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN2.74 g
    29.8 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    123 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN247 mg
    0 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN11 mg
    0 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.11 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Chicken fat (schmaltz) · Foodatron