Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted
Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted2
VS
Chicken hearts, cooked Leader
Chicken hearts, cooked6

Chicken hearts, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chicken hearts, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted for more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Chicken hearts, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    191 kcal
    185 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23.35 g
    26.41 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    10.15 g
    7.92 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    2.74 g
    2.26 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    123 mg
    48 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN247 mg
    132 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    11 mg
    19 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.11 mg
    9.03 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN22 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Chicken drumstick with skin, roasted vs Chicken hearts, cooked · Foodatron