Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Leader
2% Low-Fat Classic4
VS
Whipped1

2% Low-Fat Classic leads 4–1 · 5 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

2% Low-Fat Classic comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick 2% Low-Fat Classic for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat and more calcium.

Pick Whipped for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber and iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    81.82 kcal
    227.27 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN12.73 g
    4.55 g
  • Carbohydrate
    3.64 g
    9.09 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN3.64 g
    4.55 g
  • Total fat
    1.82 g
    20.45 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.36 g
    11.36 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    345.45 mg
    0.43 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN100 mg
    0.14 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

2% Low-Fat Classic vs Whipped · Foodatron