Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
2% Low-Fat Classic2
VS
Leader
Full Fat Soft Cheese3

Full Fat Soft Cheese leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Full Fat Soft Cheese comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick 2% Low-Fat Classic for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Full Fat Soft Cheese for more fiber, less sugar and less sodium.

Evenly matched on iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    81.82 kcal
    283.62 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN12.73 g
    4.7 g
  • Carbohydrate
    3.64 g
    3.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    1.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    3.64 g
    3.1 gWIN
  • Total fat
    1.82 g
    24.5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.36 g
    19 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    345.45 mg
    197 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    100 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

2% Low-Fat Classic vs Full Fat Soft Cheese · Foodatron