Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
2% Low-Fat Classic2
VS
Leader
Cheestrings3

Cheestrings leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Cheestrings comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick 2% Low-Fat Classic for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Cheestrings for more protein, less sugar and more calcium.

Evenly matched on iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    81.82 kcal
    305 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    12.73 g
    23 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    3.64 g
    2.5 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    3.64 g
    1 gWIN
  • Total fat
    1.82 g
    22.5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.36 g
    14 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN345.45 mg
    710 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    100 mg
    780 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

2% Low-Fat Classic vs Cheestrings · Foodatron