Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked4
VS
Shrimp, canned
Shrimp, canned4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Shrimp, canned for more protein, less saturated fat, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    20.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    1.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.19 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN591 mg
    870 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN284 mg
    80 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    145 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    2.13 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Shrimp, canned · Foodatron