Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked2
VS
Pike, cooked Leader
Pike, cooked6

Pike, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pike, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pike, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    113 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    24.69 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.15 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    331 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    73 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    40 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    3.8 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Pike, cooked · Foodatron