Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Shrimp, cooked Leader
Shrimp, cooked4

Shrimp, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    99 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    23.98 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    111 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN284 mg
    259 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    70 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.51 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    39 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked · Foodatron