Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Trout, cooked Leader
Trout, cooked4

Trout, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Trout, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Trout, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    168 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    23.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    7.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    1.65 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    450 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    30 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    0.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    2.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Trout, cooked · Foodatron