Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw Leader
Abalone, raw5
VS
Shrimp, canned
Shrimp, canned3

Abalone, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Abalone, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Shrimp, canned for more protein, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.1 g
    20.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    1.36 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    0.19 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN301 mg
    870 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN250 mg
    80 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    31 mg
    145 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    2.13 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    2 mg
    4.1 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Shrimp, canned · Foodatron