Abalone, raw vs Northern pike, cooked

Abalone, raw2

Leader

Northern pike, cooked5

Northern pike, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 2 ties

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Northern pike, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Northern pike, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Northern pike, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
105 kcal
113 kcal
Proteinmore is better
17.1 g
24.69 gWIN
Carbohydrate
6.01 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
0.76 g
0.88 g
Saturated fatless is better
0.15 g
0.15 g
Sodiumless is better
301 mg
49 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
250 mg
331 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
31 mg
73 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN3.19 mg
0.71 mg
Magnesiummore is better
WIN48 mg
40 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
2 mg
3.8 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.