Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw2
VS
Shrimp, cooked Leader
Shrimp, cooked5

Shrimp, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    24.22 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    0.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.14 g
    0.06 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    286.67 mg
    112.12 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    261.62 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    29.52 mg
    70.71 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.04 mg
    0.52 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN45.71 mg
    39.39 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.9 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Shrimp, cooked · Foodatron