Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw4
VS
Trout, cooked
Trout, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Trout, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Trout, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    168 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    17.1 g
    23.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    7.38 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    1.65 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    301 mg
    61 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    250 mg
    450 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN31 mg
    30 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    0.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN48 mg
    30 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    2 mg
    2.9 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Trout, cooked · Foodatron