Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola juice
Acerola juice4
VS
Grapes, canned Leader
Grapes, canned5

Grapes, canned leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Grapes, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola juice for less sugar, less sodium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Grapes, canned for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    23 kcal
    40 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.4 g
    0.5 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.8 g
    10.3 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.3 g
    0.6 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN4.5 g
    9.7 g
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    0.11 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0.04 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN3 mg
    6 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    97 mg
    107 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.5 mg
    0.98 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN12 mg
    6 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1600 mg
    1 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola juice vs Grapes, canned · Foodatron