Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola juice
Acerola juice4
VS
Plums, canned in juice Leader
Plums, canned in juice5

Plums, canned in juice leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Plums, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola juice for less sugar, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Plums, canned in juice for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    23 kcal
    58 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.4 g
    0.51 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    4.8 g
    15.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.3 g
    0.9 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN4.5 g
    14.22 g
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    3 mg
    1 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    97 mg
    154 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    10 mg
    10 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.5 mg
    0.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN12 mg
    8 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1600 mg
    2.8 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola juice vs Plums, canned in juice · Foodatron