Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw3
VS
Sweet cherries, canned in juice Leader
Sweet cherries, canned in juice6

Sweet cherries, canned in juice leads 6–3 · 9 categories decided

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw: 100 g · Sweet cherries, canned in juice: 100 g.

The verdict

Sweet cherries, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 6 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw for more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Sweet cherries, canned in juice for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    32 kcal
    54 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.4 g
    0.91 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    7.69 g
    13.81 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.1 g
    1.5 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    12.31 g
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.07 g
    0 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    7 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN146 mg
    131 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    12 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.2 mg
    0.58 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN18 mg
    12 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1677.6 mg
    2.5 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw vs Sweet cherries, canned in juice · Foodatron