Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked7
VS
Cream-style corn, canned
Cream-style corn, canned2

Acorn squash, cooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Cream-style corn, canned for more protein and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    72 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    1.74 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    18.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    1.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.23 g
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.42 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    134 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    3 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.93 mg
    0.38 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    17 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    4.6 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Cream-style corn, canned · Foodatron