Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked7
VS
Crookneck squash, raw
Crookneck squash, raw2

Acorn squash, cooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Crookneck squash, raw for less sodium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    19 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN1.12 g
    1.01 g
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    3.88 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    1 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    2.88 g
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.27 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    222 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    21 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.93 mg
    0.44 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    10.8 mg
    19.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Crookneck squash, raw · Foodatron