Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked7
VS
Pearl onions, cooked
Pearl onions, cooked1

Acorn squash, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Pearl onions, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Pearl onions, cooked for more protein.

Evenly matched on saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    42 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    1.36 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    9.56 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    1.4 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    4.73 g
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.03 g
    0.03 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    239 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    166 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    22 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.93 mg
    0.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    11 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    5.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Pearl onions, cooked · Foodatron