Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked7
VS
Stewed tomatoes, canned
Stewed tomatoes, canned1

Acorn squash, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Stewed tomatoes, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Stewed tomatoes, canned for more iron.

Evenly matched on saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    26 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN1.12 g
    0.91 g
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    6.19 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    1 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.52 g
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.03 g
    0.03 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    221 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    207 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    34 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    1.33 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN43 mg
    12 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    7.9 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Stewed tomatoes, canned · Foodatron