Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked5
VS
Succotash, cooked
Succotash, cooked3

Acorn squash, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Succotash, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Succotash, cooked for more protein, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    111 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.12 g
    5.07 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    24.37 g
  • Fibermore is better
    4.4 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.03 g
    0.15 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    253 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN437 mg
    410 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN44 mg
    17 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    1.52 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    43 mg
    53 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    8.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Succotash, cooked · Foodatron