Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked Leader
Acorn squash, cooked5
VS
Tomato puree, canned
Tomato puree, canned4

Acorn squash, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Acorn squash, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Tomato puree, canned for more protein, more potassium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2 g
    4.34 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    26.04 g
    23.63 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN7.86 g
    5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    12.71 g
  • Total fat
    0.25 g
    0.55 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.08 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7.14 mg
    73.68 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    780.36 mg
    1155.26 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN78.57 mg
    47.37 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.66 mg
    4.68 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN76.79 mg
    60.53 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    19.29 mg
    27.89 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Tomato puree, canned · Foodatron