Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Agar seaweed, raw Leader
Agar seaweed, raw5
VS
Succotash, cooked
Succotash, cooked3

Agar seaweed, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Agar seaweed, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Agar seaweed, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Succotash, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    26 kcal
    111 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.54 g
    5.07 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    6.75 g
    24.37 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.5 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.28 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.03 g
    0.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.01 g
    0.15 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN9 mg
    253 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    226 mg
    410 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN54 mg
    17 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.86 mg
    1.52 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN67 mg
    53 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    8.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Agar seaweed, raw vs Succotash, cooked · Foodatron