All-purpose flour vs Chickpea Rotini

Chickpea Rotini leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpea Rotini comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for less sugar and less saturated fat.

Pick Chickpea Rotini for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
364 kcal
339.29 kcal
Proteinmore is better
10.33 g
21.43 gWIN
Carbohydrate
76.31 g
60.71 g
Fibermore is better
2.7 g
7.14 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
WIN0.27 g
3.57 g
Total fat
0.98 g
6.25 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.16 g
0.89 g
Sodiumless is better
2 mg
0 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
107 mg
—
Calciummore is better
15 mg
51.79 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
4.64 mg
5.36 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
22 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.