Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked0
VS
Leader
Chickpea Rotini5

Chickpea Rotini leads 5–0 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpea Rotini comes out ahead, winning 5 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Chickpea Rotini for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    339.29 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    21.43 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    60.71 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    7.14 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    3.57 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    6.25 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.89 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    6 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    51.79 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.1 mg
    5.36 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Chickpea Rotini · Foodatron