Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked2
VS
Tortilla chips, plain Leader
Tortilla chips, plain5

Tortilla chips, plain leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Tortilla chips, plain comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium and more iron.

Pick Tortilla chips, plain for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    472 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    7.1 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    67.78 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    5.4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.78 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    20.68 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    2.81 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    328 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    182 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    47 mg
    106 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    1.52 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    84 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Tortilla chips, plain · Foodatron