Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked3
VS
Thai Wheat Noodles2

Amaranth, cooked leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Thai Wheat Noodles: 198 g.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Thai Wheat Noodles for more protein and more fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    102 kcal
    310 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.8 g
    10 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.69 g
    63 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.1 g
    4 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    1.58 g
    2 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.5 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN6 mg
    130.01 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    135 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN47 mg
    30 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.1 mg
    0.5 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    65 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Thai Wheat Noodles · Foodatron