Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth leaves, cooked Leader
Amaranth leaves, cooked7
VS
Celeriac, cooked
Celeriac, cooked0

Amaranth leaves, cooked leads 7–0 · 7 categories decided

Amaranth leaves, cooked: 100 g · Celeriac, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Amaranth leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth leaves, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    21 kcal
    27 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN2.11 g
    0.96 g
  • Carbohydrate
    4.11 g
    5.9 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.18 g
    0.19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN257 mg
    297 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN641 mg
    173 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN209 mg
    26 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.26 mg
    0.43 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    12 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN41.1 mg
    3.6 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth leaves, cooked vs Celeriac, cooked · Foodatron