Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Chickpea Rotini

Chickpea Rotini leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chickpea Rotini comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for less sugar, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Chickpea Rotini for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
371 kcal
339.29 kcal
Proteinmore is better
13.56 g
21.43 gWIN
Carbohydrate
65.25 g
60.71 g
Fibermore is better
6.7 g
7.14 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
WIN1.69 g
3.57 g
Total fat
7.02 g
6.25 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.46 g
0.89 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
4 mg
0 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
508 mg
—
Calciummore is better
WIN159 mg
51.79 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN7.61 mg
5.36 mg
Magnesiummore is better
248 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
4.2 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.