Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth grain, uncooked
Amaranth grain, uncooked2
VS
Leader
Wholewheat Penne3

Wholewheat Penne leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Wholewheat Penne comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein and more fiber.

Pick Wholewheat Penne for less sugar, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    329.33 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    5.7 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    27.4 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN6.7 g
    3.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.69 g
    0.7 gWIN
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    0.1 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    2 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    508 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    159 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    7.61 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    248 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    4.2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Wholewheat Penne · Foodatron