Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked5
VS
Thai Wheat Noodles2

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Thai Wheat Noodles for less sugar and less saturated fat.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    156.57 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    5.05 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    31.82 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN6.7 g
    2.02 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.69 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    1.01 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    0.25 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    65.66 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    508 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN159 mg
    15.15 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    0.25 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    248 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    4.2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Thai Wheat Noodles · Foodatron