Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Ancho peppers, dried Leader
Ancho peppers, dried6
VS
Succotash, cooked
Succotash, cooked2

Ancho peppers, dried leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided

Ancho peppers, dried: 100 g · Succotash, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Ancho peppers, dried comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Ancho peppers, dried for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Succotash, cooked for less saturated fat and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    281 kcal
    111 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN11.86 g
    5.07 g
  • Carbohydrate
    51.42 g
    24.37 g
  • Fibermore is better
    21.6 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    8.2 g
    0.8 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.82 g
    0.15 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN43 mg
    253 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN2411 mg
    410 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN61 mg
    17 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN10.93 mg
    1.52 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN113 mg
    53 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    2 mg
    8.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Ancho peppers, dried vs Succotash, cooked · Foodatron