Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apple butter
Apple butter3
VS
Chili con carne with beans Leader
Chili con carne with beans7

Chili con carne with beans leads 7–3 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Chili con carne with beans comes out ahead, winning 7 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apple butter for less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    173 kcal
    107 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.39 g
    5.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    42.47 g
    13.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.5 g
    3.3 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    35.3 g
    1.87 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.3 g
    3.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    1.25 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN15 mg
    449 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    91 mg
    264 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    14 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.31 mg
    1.34 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    4 mg
    28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.6 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apple butter vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron