Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apple, raw Leader
Apple, raw7
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned1

Apple, raw leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Apple, raw comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apple, raw for more protein, more fiber, less sugar, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Pick Apples, canned for more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    57 kcal
    67 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.28 g
    0.18 g
  • Carbohydrate
    13.6 g
    16.84 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.4 g
    2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN10.04 g
    14.84 g
  • Total fat
    0.15 g
    0.43 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    3 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN100 mg
    70 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN6 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.13 mg
    0.24 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN5 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apple, raw vs Apples, canned · Foodatron