Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apple, raw
Apple, raw3
VS
Sweet cherries, canned in juice Leader
Sweet cherries, canned in juice5

Sweet cherries, canned in juice leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Apple, raw: 100 g · Sweet cherries, canned in juice: 100 g.

The verdict

Sweet cherries, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apple, raw for more fiber, less sugar and less sodium.

Pick Sweet cherries, canned in juice for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    57 kcal
    54 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.28 g
    0.91 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    13.6 g
    13.81 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN2.4 g
    1.5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN10.04 g
    12.31 g
  • Total fat
    0.15 g
    0.02 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    3 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    100 mg
    131 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    6 mg
    14 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.13 mg
    0.58 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    5 mg
    12 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    2.5 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apple, raw vs Sweet cherries, canned in juice · Foodatron