Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apples, dried Leader
Apples, dried8
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2

Apples, dried leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Apples, dried comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apples, dried for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    243 kcal
    67 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN0.93 g
    0.18 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.89 g
    16.84 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN8.7 g
    2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    57.19 g
    14.84 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.32 g
    0.43 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.05 g
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    87 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN450 mg
    70 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN14 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.4 mg
    0.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN3.9 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apples, dried vs Apples, canned · Foodatron