Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apricots, canned in juice Leader
Apricots, canned in juice8
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2

Apricots, canned in juice leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Apricots, canned in juice comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apricots, canned in juice for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN1.31 g
    0.27 g
  • Carbohydrate
    25.71 g
    25.13 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN3.33 g
    2.99 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    22.38 g
    22.15 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.08 g
    0.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.01 g
    0.1 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    8.33 mg
    4.48 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN343.75 mg
    104.48 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN25 mg
    5.97 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.63 mg
    0.36 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN20.83 mg
    4.48 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.21 mg
    0.3 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apricots, canned in juice vs Apples, canned · Foodatron