Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Apricots, dried Leader
Apricots, dried8
VS
Apples, canned
Apples, canned2

Apricots, dried leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Apricots, dried: 100 g · Apples, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Apricots, dried comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Apricots, dried for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Apples, canned for less sugar and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    241 kcal
    67 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.39 g
    0.18 g
  • Carbohydrate
    62.64 g
    16.84 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN7.3 g
    2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    53.44 g
    14.84 gWIN
  • Total fat
    0.51 g
    0.43 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.07 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    10 mg
    3 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN1162 mg
    70 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN55 mg
    4 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.66 mg
    0.24 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN32 mg
    3 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Apricots, dried vs Apples, canned · Foodatron