Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked Leader
Arrowhead, cooked5
VS
Cream-style corn, canned
Cream-style corn, canned2

Arrowhead, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Arrowhead, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Cream-style corn, canned for less sodium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN5.76 g
    2.42 g
  • Carbohydrate
    20.69 g
    25.18 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    1.67 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    4.49 g
  • Total fat
    0.13 g
    0.58 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    325.64 mg
    4.17 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN1129.49 mg
    186.11 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN8.97 mg
    4.17 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.55 mg
    0.53 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN62.82 mg
    23.61 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.38 mg
    6.39 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Cream-style corn, canned · Foodatron