Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked3
VS
Crushed tomatoes, canned Leader
Crushed tomatoes, canned4

Crushed tomatoes, canned leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Arrowhead, cooked: 100 g · Crushed tomatoes, canned: 100 g.

The verdict

Crushed tomatoes, canned comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more magnesium.

Pick Crushed tomatoes, canned for less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    78 kcal
    32 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN4.49 g
    1.64 g
  • Carbohydrate
    16.14 g
    7.29 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    1.9 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    4.4 g
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.28 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.04 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    254 mg
    186 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN881 mg
    293 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    34 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.21 mg
    1.3 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN49 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.3 mg
    9.2 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Crushed tomatoes, canned · Foodatron