Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowhead, cooked
Arrowhead, cooked2
VS
Tomato puree, canned Leader
Tomato puree, canned5

Tomato puree, canned leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Tomato puree, canned comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowhead, cooked for more protein and more magnesium.

Pick Tomato puree, canned for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN5.76 g
    4.34 g
  • Carbohydrate
    20.69 g
    23.63 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    5 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    12.71 g
  • Total fat
    0.13 g
    0.55 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.08 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    325.64 mg
    73.68 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    1129.49 mg
    1155.26 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    8.97 mg
    47.37 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.55 mg
    4.68 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN62.82 mg
    60.53 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.38 mg
    27.89 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowhead, cooked vs Tomato puree, canned · Foodatron